RESUMO
Objectives: The coronavirus pandemic significantly impacted endoscopic practice. During lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, infectious substances disseminate; therefore, we developed an infection control device (STEP-L) for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and examined its usefulness. Methods: STEP-L wraps around the patient's buttocks and covers the endoscope. Using lower endoscopy training models, three endoscopists performed 18 colonoscopies with STEP-L (group S) and without (group C). Endoscopic insertion time and pigmented areas of ââgloves and diapers after the examination were compared between both groups. Results: Insertion of the endoscope up to the cecum was possible in all 18 examinations. The insertion time to the cecum was 52.4 ± 19.0 s in group S and 53.9 ± 13.3 s in group C. The pigmented areas of the ââgloves measured 39,108.0 ± 16,155.3 pixels in group C, but were significantly reduced to 2610.5 ± 4333.8 pixels in group S (p < 0.05). The pigmented areas of the diapers measured 2280.9 ± 3285.2 pixels in group C, but were significantly reduced to 138.0 ± 82.9 pixels in group S (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Using STEP-L does not change the insertion time, and is technically feasible. STEP-L significantly reduces the adhesion of virtual pollutants to the surroundings, suggesting that this device is useful for infection control during lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.
RESUMO
Background and study aims Infection control is essential when performing endoscopic procedures, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we have developed a new shielding device called STEP for infection control in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients and methods STEP consists of a mask worn by the patient and a drape that is connected to the mask and covers the endoscope. A suction tube attached to the mask prevents aerosols from spreading. The endoscopist operates the endoscope through the drape. Three endoscopists performed a total of 18 examinations using an upper endoscopy training model with and without STEP. Endoscopic images were evaluated by three other endoscopists, using a visual analog scale. We also simulated contact, droplet, and aerosol infection and evaluated the utility of STEP. Results All examinations were conducted without a problem. Mean procedure time was 126.3â±â11.6 seconds with STEP and 122.3â±â10.0 seconds without STEP. The mean visual analog score was 90.7â±â10.1 with STEP and 90.4â±â10.0 without STEP. In the contact model, adherence of simulated contaminants was 4.9â±â1.4â% without STEP and 0â% with STEP. In the droplet model, the number of simulated contaminants attached to the paper was 338â273â±â90â735 pixels without STEP and 0 with STEP. In the aerosol model, the total number of particles was 346â837â±â9485 without STEP and was significantly reduced to 222â±â174 with STEP. Conclusions No effect on examination time or endoscopic image quality was observed when using STEP in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Using STEP reduced the diffusion of simulated contaminants in all three infection models.
